Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
5208358 
Journal Article 
Comparison of harvesting methods for microalgae Chlorella sp. and its potential use as a biodiesel feedstock 
Ahmad, AL; Mat Yasin, NH; Derek, CJ; Lim, JK 
2014 
Yes 
Environmental Technology
ISSN: 0959-3330
EISSN: 1479-487X 
35 
17-20 
2244-2253 
English 
25145177 
WOS:000335851600015 
Three methods for harvesting Chlorella sp. biomass were analysed in this paper--centrifugation, membrane microfiltration and coagulation: there was no significant difference between the total amount of biomass obtained by centrifugation and membrane microfiltration, i.e., 0.1174 +/- 0.0308 and 0.1145 +/- 0.0268 g, respectively. Almost the same total lipid content was obtained using both methods, i.e., 27.96 +/- 0.77 and 26.43 +/- 0.67% for centrifugation and microfiltration, respectively. However, harvesting by coagulation resulted in the lowest biomass and lipid content. Similar fatty acid profiles were obtained for all of the harvesting methods, indicating that the main components were palmitic acid (C16:0), oleic acid (C18:1) and linoleic acid (C18:2). However, the amounts of the individual fatty acids were higher for microfiltration than for centrifugation and coagulation; coagulation performed the most poorly in this regard by producing the smallest amount of fatty acids (41.61 +/- 6.49 mg/g dw). The harvesting method should also be selected based on the cost benefit and energy requirements. The membrane filtration method offers the advantages of currently decreasing capital costs, a high efficiency and low maintenance and energy requirements and is thus the most efficient method for microalgae harvesting.