Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5243588
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Comparison of nano- and microfibrillated cellulose films
Author(s)
Kumar, V; Bollström, R; Yang, A; Chen, Q; Chen, G; Salminen, P; Bousfield, D; Toivakka, M
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Cellulose
ISSN:
0969-0239
EISSN:
1572-882X
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Location
DORDRECHT
Book Title
Cellulose
Volume
21, no. 5
Issue
5
Page Numbers
3443-3456
Language
English
DOI
10.1007/s10570-014-0357-5
Web of Science Id
WOS:000341489300026
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0357-5 Available from publisher's site
Exit
Abstract
Nanocellulose is an interesting building block for functional materials and has gained considerable interest due to its mechanical robustness, large surface area and biodegradability. It can be formed into various structures such as solids, films and gels such as hydrogels and aerogels and combined with polymers or other materials to form composites. Mechanical, optical and barrier properties of nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) films were studied in order to understand their potential for packaging and functional printing applications. Impact of raw material choice and nanocellulose production process on these properties was evaluated. MFC and NFC were produced following two different routes. NFC was produced using a chemical pretreatment followed by a high pressure homogenization, whereas MFC was produced using a mechanical treatment only. TEMPO-mediated oxidation followed by one step of high pressure (2,000 bar) homogenization seems to produce a similar type of NFC from both hardwood and softwood. NFC films showed superior mechanical and optical properties compared with MFC films; however, MFC films demonstrated better barrier properties against oxygen and water vapor. Both the MFC and NFC films were excellent barriers against mineral oil used in ordinary printing inks and dichlorobenzene, a common solvent used in functional printing inks. Barrier properties against vegetable oil were also found to be exceptionally good for both the NFC and MFC films.
Keywords
biodegradability; cellulose; hardwood; homogenization; hydrocolloids; mineral oil; optical properties; oxidation; packaging; polymers; printing inks; raw materials; softwood; surface area; vegetable oil; water vapor; Internet resource
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity