Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
526882
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The effects of mobile phones on pacemaker function
Author(s)
Tandogan, I; Temizhan, A; Yetkin, E; Guray, Y; Ileri, M; Duru, E; Sasmaz, A
Year
2005
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
International Journal of Cardiology
ISSN:
0167-5273
EISSN:
1874-1754
Volume
103
Issue
1
Page Numbers
51-58
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.08.031
Abstract
Objectives: The electromagnetic field generated by different systems have well-recognized adverse effects on pacemaker functions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the adverse effects of mobile phones on pacemaker functions. Methods and results: A total of 679 patients with permanent pacemakers were enrolled in this study. The study was performed in two steps. Pacemaker lead polarity was unipolar in the first step and bipolar in the second step. Pacemaker sensitivity was first at nominal values, it was then reduced to the minimal value for that pacemaker and tested again. Two mobile phones were symmetrically located on both sides of the pacemaker pocket with the antennas being equidistant at 50, 30, 20 and 10 cm and in close contact with the pocket. The tests were performed when both mobiles were opened, on stand-by, were receiving a call, during the call and were closed. Thirty-seven patients with pacemakers were adversely affected (5.5%) (33 VVI-R pacemakers were converted to asynchronous mode, and 3 were inhibited, I DDD-R pacemaker developed ventricular triggering). When the lead polarity was unipolar, the rate of adverse effect was higher when compared to the bipolar state (4.12% and 1.40%,p < 0.01). The increase in sensitivity was not an independent factor on the rate of being affected (p > 0.05). The rate of observing an adverse effect increased as the pacemaker got older (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mobile phones might have adverse effects on pacemaker functions under certain conditions. This does not result in any symptoms other than the inhibition of pacemakers, and pacemaker functions return to normal when the mobile phones are removed away from the patient. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
pacemaker; mobile telephone; electromagnetic interference; cellular phones; electromagnetic-interference; cardiac-pacemakers; permanent pacemakers; telephones; risk
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity