Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
537257
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effect on Maxillary Arch Development of Early 2-Stage Palatoplasty by Modified Furlow Technique and Conventional 1-Stage Palatoplasty in Children With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Author(s)
Yamanishi, T; Nishio, J; Kohara, H; Hirano, Y; Sako, M; Yamanishi, Y; Adachi, T; Miya, S; Mukai, T
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
ISSN:
0278-2391
EISSN:
1531-5053
Volume
67
Issue
10
Page Numbers
2210-2216
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.038
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the palatal morphology of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after early 2-stage palatoplasty (ETS) consisting of soft palate closure by a modified Furlow palatoplasty at 12 months of age and hard palate closure at 18 months of age. We compared the result with the palatal morphology obtained by Wardill-Kilner push-back palatoplasty (PB) at 12 months of age with that of children with noncleft palate. In the present study we investigated whether ETS can result in better palatal development than conventional PB. Materials and Methods: Thirty subjects were treated by ETS and 42 underwent PB. We also included cross-sectional data obtained from 66 children with noncleft palate as control. We measured the arch length, width, and cleft width using dental cast models that were consecutively taken at 3 months to 4 yrs of age and compared the results among the 3 groups. Results: At 4 years of age, the anteroposterior palatal length of ETS was significantly longer than that of PB by 9.8%, and the transversal palatal width of ETS was also markedly wider than that of PB at every point measured. Furthermore, ETS showed potential catch-up growth in the anteroposterior palatal length from 12 months to 4 years of age. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that ETS has a considerable benefit for the palatal development of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate compared with PB. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2210-2216, 2009
Keywords
hard-palate; facial growth; dental arch; closure; repair; speech; surgery
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity