Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
5379493 
Journal Article 
Mechanical and electrothermal debonding: effect on ceramic veneers and dental pulp 
Lee-Knight, CT; Wylie, SG; Major, PW; Glover, KE; Grace, M 
1997 
Yes 
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
ISSN: 0889-5406
EISSN: 1097-6752 
MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC 
ST LOUIS 
112 
3 
263-270 
English 
9294354 
WOS:A1997XV07600009 
This study compared the ability of three orthodontic debonding techniques for the removal of brackets from ceramic veneers without creating veneer damage. Three experimental groups included metal brackets debonded by either Howe pliers, lift off debonding instrument (LODI, 3M Unitek), or electrothermal debonder (ETD, "A" Company), as well as a group of electrothermally debonded ceramic brackets. It also evaluated and compared the intrapulpal temperature changes produced by electrothermal debonding metal and ceramic brackets. A sample of 95 extracted maxillary first premolars were prepared and restored with Mirage ceramic veneers (Chameleon Dental Products, Inc.). Veneer buccal surfaces were treated with 2.5% hydrofluoric acid, before silane application and bracket bonding with a no-mix resin. Specimens were thermocycled before debonding. All debonded specimens were examined under x20 magnification for veneer damage. A thermocouple was positioned at the pulp chamber buccal wall to record temperature increases (due to ETD activation) through a digital thermometer. Results suggest that ETD provides predictable debonding to ceramic brackets with no veneer damage and minimal risk to the pulp. Removal of metal brackets through electrothermal debonding produced ceramic damage in 13% of cases, and elevated temperatures beyond the threshold of irreversible pulpal damage (5.5 degrees C) in 46% of cases. Howe plier and LODI bracket removal are associated with ceramic damage incidence of 21% and 35%, respectively.