Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5379593
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Silane influence on bonding to CAD-CAM composites: An interfacial fracture toughness study
Author(s)
Eldafrawy, M; Greimers, L; Bekaert, S; Gailly, P; Lenaerts, C; Nguyen, JF; Sadoun, M; Mainjot, A
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Dental Materials
ISSN:
0109-5641
EISSN:
1879-0097
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Location
OXFORD
Volume
35
Issue
9
Page Numbers
1279-1290
Language
English
PMID
31178077
DOI
10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.019
Web of Science Id
WOS:000481571700011
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate silane influence on the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) of composite cement, with the two sub-classes of CAD-CAM composites, polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) and dispersed fillers (DF), after hydrofluoric acid etching (HF) or airborne-particle abrasion (AB). A secondary objective was to correlate results with developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) and surface wettability.
METHODS:
Experimental PICN and DF blocks were cut into equilateral half-prisms, which were treated with HF or AB, then treated with an experimental silane or not and bonded to their counterparts with an experimental light-cure resin cement. After thermocycling, samples (n=30 per group) were tested for IFT using the notchless triangular prism test in a water bath at 36°C. Moreover, profilometry and contact angle measurement were performed on rectangular samples of each group. Finally, bonding interface was analysed by SEM.
RESULTS:
PICN-HF treated with silane showed the highest IFT significantly. Three-way ANOVA revealed the influence of silane, material class and surface pre-treatment (HF or AB) on IFT (p<0.05). When silane was used, IFT was correlated with Sdr, while surface wettability was increased. Silane application significantly increased IFT for PICN but not for DF, while PICN performed better with HF and DF with AB.
SIGNIFICANCE:
Silane increases IFT of composite cement with PICNs, but not with DF materials. Results suggest that silane increases the micromechanical bond by promoting resin cement spreading and penetration in surface roughness. This roughness is significantly higher for pre-treated PICNs than for DF due to their specific honeycomb microstructure when etched, which explains their better bonding properties.
Tags
PFAS
•
PFAS 150
Literature Search August 2019
PubMed
Not prioritized for screening
(Heptafluoropropyl)trimethylsilane
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity