Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5403135
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The effects of volatile anesthetics on intraoperative monitoring of myogenic motor-evoked potentials to pranscranial electrical stimulation and on partial neuromuscular blockade during propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans
Author(s)
Sekimoto, K; Nishikawa, K; Ishizeki, J; Kubo, K; Saito, S; Goto, F
Year
2006
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
ISSN:
0898-4921
EISSN:
1537-1921
Volume
18
Issue
2
Page Numbers
106-111
Language
English
PMID
16628063
DOI
10.1097/00008506-200604000-00003
Web of Science Id
WOS:000237009800003
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of volatile anesthetics on transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tcMEP) in humans anesthetized with propofol/fentanyl/nitrous oxide and on partial neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The authors studied 35 ASA I and II patients who were undergoing elective craniotomy and brain tumor resection. The patients were randomized to one of three groups to receive halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), or sevoflurane (SEV). Anesthetic depth was initially adjusted using the bispectral index to 40+/-5, and NMB was adjusted to 40%-50% of one twitch of train of four (T1) after recovery from intubation. MEPs with train of five square-wave pulses were elicited using screw electrodes placed in the skull over C3-C4. After craniotomy, the inhalational agent was introduced at 0.5 MAC and then 1.0 MAC (20 minutes each), and the effects on MEPs, NMB, and hemodynamic variables were studied. A decrease in BIS and systolic blood pressure was observed with all agents. Both SEV and ISO at 1.0 MAC significantly decreased train-of-four ratio from 38.4+/-18.1 at control to 19.0+/-9.7 and from 35.3+/-12.4 to 26.1+/-13.7, respectively (P<0.001), but not HAL at 1.0 MAC. The amplitudes of tcMEPs were significantly reduced by all agents at 1.0 MAC, with the effect being less in HAL at 0.5 MAC. We have shown that HAL had a lesser suppressive effect on MEPs than either ISO or SEV at 0.5 MAC, which was partially due to a lesser degree of NMB.
Keywords
motor-evoked potentials; volatile anesthetics; neuromuscular blockade; muscle relaxant
Tags
PFAS
•
PFAS 150
Literature Search Update December 2020
PubMed
Literature Search August 2019
PubMed
Web of Science
Not prioritized for screening
Sevoflurane
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2- (fluoromethoxy)propane
•
PFAS Universe
Data Source
Web of Science
Pubmed
Isoflurane
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity