Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5406479
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Environmental safety: Air pollution while using MIRUS™ for short-term sedation in the ICU
Author(s)
Herzog-Niescery, J; Vogelsang, H; Gude, P; Seipp, HM; Uhl, W; Weber, TP; Bellgardt, M
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN:
0001-5172
EISSN:
1399-6576
Volume
63
Issue
1
Page Numbers
86-92
Language
English
PMID
30088264
DOI
10.1111/aas.13222
Web of Science Id
WOS:000452296100012
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
MIRUS™ is a device for target-controlled inhalational sedation in the ICU in combination with use of isoflurane, or sevoflurane, or desflurane. The feasibility of this device has recently been proven; however, ICU staff exposure may restrict its application. We investigated ICU ambient room pollution during daily work to estimate ICU personnel exposure while using MIRUS™.
METHODS:
This observational study assessed pollution levels around 15 adult surgical patients who received volatile anaesthetics-based sedation for a median of 11 hours. Measurements were performed by photoacoustic gas monitoring in real-time at different positions near the patient and in the personnel's breathing zone. Additionally, the impact of the Clean Air™ open reservoir scavenging system on volatile agent pollution was evaluated.
RESULTS:
Baseline concentrations [ppm] during intervention and rest periods were isoflurane = 0.58 ± 0.49, = 5.72; sevoflurane = 0.22 ± 0.20, = 7.93; and desflurane = 0.65 ± 0.57, = 6.65. Refilling MIRUS™ with liquid anaesthetic yielded gas concentrations of = 2.18 ± 1.48 ppm and = 13.03 ± 9.37 ppm in the personnel's breathing zone. Air pollution in the patient's room was approximately five times higher without a scavenging system.
CONCLUSION:
Ambient room pollution was minimal in most cases, and the measured values were within or below the recommended exposure limits. Caution should be taken during refilling of the MIRUS™ system, as this was accompanied by higher pollution levels. The combined use of air-conditioning and gas scavenging systems is strongly recommended.
Keywords
desflurane; enviromental safety; exposure limits; gas pollution; inhalational sedation; intensive care unit; isoflurane; MIRUS; risk reduction; sevoflurane
Tags
PFAS
•
PFAS 150
Literature Search Update December 2020
PubMed
Literature Search August 2019
PubMed
Web of Science
Not prioritized for screening
Sevoflurane
1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2- (fluoromethoxy)propane
•
PFAS Universe
Data Source
Web of Science
Pubmed
Isoflurane
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity