Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5926221
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Letter
Title
Data error in study of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years
Author(s)
Nader, PR; Bradley, RH; Houts, RM
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
ISSN:
0098-7484
EISSN:
1538-3598
Volume
301
Issue
20
Page Numbers
2094-2095
Language
English
PMID
19470986
DOI
10.1001/jama.2009.701
Web of Science Id
WOS:000266328800020
Relationship(s)
is comment on/response to
1060504
Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity from ages 9 to 15 years
Abstract
To the Editor: In our article “Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity From Ages 9 to 15 Years,”1 an error occurred in the programming syntax used to clean the accelerometer-determined physical activity data for age 12 years and age 15 years. A subsample of days that should have been deleted as invalid (implausible total count relative to counts on valid days) was retained for some individuals. For the analysis sample at age 12 years, this had the effect of altering the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) estimates of 164 individuals and excluding 3 individuals. For the analysis sample at age 15 years, this had the effect of altering the MVPA estimates of 90 individuals and excluding 2 individuals. One additional individual at age 12 years was eliminated from this analysis because the revised score was identified as an extreme outlier (weekday MVPA >450 min/d). The estimated levels of MVPA at age 12 years and age 15 years increased slightly, but the statistically significant findings of decreases in daily MVPA for boys and girls between ages 9 and 15 years were not altered. Corrected text, tables, and figures are included in the Correction section of this issue of JAMA.
Although correcting the data errors resulted in small changes to many of the reported point estimates, none of the basic findings changed significantly. We apologize for any inconvenience that might have resulted from these errors.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity