Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6048524
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Revisiting Classic Acetic Acid Synthesis: Optimal Hydrogen Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Utilization
Author(s)
Medrano-Garcia, JD; Ruiz-Femenia, R; Caballero, JA
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Computer - Aided Chemical Engineering
ISSN:
1570-7946
EISSN:
2543-1331
Publisher
Elsevier
Book Title
Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
Volume
46
Page Numbers
145-150
DOI
10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50025-4
Web of Science Id
WOS:000495447200025
URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128186343500254
Exit
Abstract
Acetic acid is a bulk chemical with many applications in the manufacture of several important products. The carbon footprint of its classic synthesis process (methanol carbonylation) is around 1.3921 - 1.8746 kg CO2-eq/kg, which adds up as the commodity is used in further syntheses. Hence, a reduction in the acetic acid synthesis Global Warming Potential (GWP) would impact in many end products GWP. We propose an acetic acid synthesis superstructure, including different syngas synthesis processes, gas separation technologies and methanol synthesis, which is aimed at reducing both the cost and GWP of the process. Results show that, integrating the methanol synthesis process provides the best results in both objectives. When minimizing the cost (classic synthesis) is best to use an Auto-thermal Reforming (ATR) and CO absorption configuration (0.388 $/kg, 1.832 kgCO2-eq/kg). Adding a fuel cell and a Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) reactor overall reduces both cost and emission (0.280 $/kg, 1.590 kgCO2-eq/kg) of the synthesis and changes the configuration to Partial Oxidation (POX) and cryogenic distillation. Minimum emission (0.102 kgCO2-eq/kg) can also be achieved with the fuel cell plus RWGS combo, POX and Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA), although the cost is almost tripled (0.978 $/kg).
Keywords
CO2 utilization; methane reforming; carbon monoxide separation; reverse water gas shift; acetic acid synthesis
Editor(s)
Özkan, Leyla
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity