Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6063121
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Dehydration of natural gas using membranes. Part I: Composite membranes
Author(s)
Lin, H; Thompson, SM; Serbanescu-Martin, A; Wijmans, JG; Amo, KD; Lokhandwala, KA; Merkel, TC
Year
2012
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Membrane Science
ISSN:
0376-7388
Volume
413
Page Numbers
70-81
DOI
10.1016/j.memsci.2012.04.009
Web of Science Id
WOS:000306962500007
URL
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738812003092
Exit
Abstract
All natural gas must be dried before it enters distribution pipelines, to control corrosion and prevent formation of solid hydrocarbon/water hydrates. Glycol dehydrators are often used for natural gas dehydration, which, however, causes the emissions of hazardous volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In light of increasing concerns about VOC emissions, this study examines the technical feasibility of membrane technology for natural gas dehydration. More specifically, the Part I of this study is focused on the laboratory-scale tests of composite membranes. First, the current state-of-the-art research in membrane materials for H2O/CH4 separation is reviewed. Hydrophilic microphase-separated block copolymers (Pebax®) with promising H2O/CH4 separation properties were identified and made into industrial thin film composite membranes. Second, the composite membranes were extensively tested in a laboratory permeation cell by varying operating parameters including feed gas composition, feed gas flow rate and the flow rate of the dry sweep gas on the permeate. Water vapor permeation was mainly restricted by the microporous support and paper layers of the composite membranes, as opposed to methane permeation, in which the main transport resistance was in the selective layer. Increasing sweep gas flow rate on the permeate side of the membrane decreased the overall membrane transport resistance to water vapor, thus increasing water vapor permeance (up to 2000gpu) and H2O/CH4 selectivity (up to 1500). Finally, the effect of different layers of composite membranes on water vapor permeance and water/methane selectivity is interpreted using a resistance-in-series model. The Part II of this study will describe a field test of Pebax®-based membranes at a natural gas processing plant and membrane process designs to maximize the membrane separation efficiency.
Keywords
Composite membrane; Dehydration; Natural gas; Water vapor; Separation
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity