Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6102284
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The role of adsorbate size on adsorption of Ne and Xe on graphite
Author(s)
Prasetyo, L; Loi, QK; Johnathan Tan, S; Do, DD; Nicholson, D
Year
2018
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
ISSN:
0021-9797
EISSN:
1095-7103
Volume
524
Page Numbers
490-503
Language
English
PMID
29679935
DOI
10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.091
Web of Science Id
WOS:000434494400054
Abstract
We have carried out an extensive grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation to investigate the adsorption of neon and xenon on graphite. The adsorbate collision diameters of neon and xenon are smaller and greater respectively, than the commensurate graphite lattice spacing λ=3×3R300 of 0.426 nm. Simulated isotherms and isosteric heats were obtained using a graphite model that has been shown to describe successfully the adsorbate transitions for krypton, methane and nitrogen by Prasetyo et al. (2017), which have collision diameters close to λ. Neon does not exhibit commensurate (C) packing because the gain in the intermolecular potential interactions in the incommensurate (IC) packing when molecules move away from carbon hexagon centres, does not compensate for the increase in the solid-fluid potential energy. Xenon, on the other hand, exhibits IC packing because its molecular size is greater than λ. Nevertheless, at a sufficiently high chemical potential, the first layer of xenon changes from the IC to C packing (in contrast to what is observed for krypton, nitrogen and methane). This transition occurs because the decrease in the xenon intermolecular interactions is sufficiently compensated by the increase in the solid-fluid interaction, and the increase in the fluid-fluid interactions between molecules in the first layer and those in the second layer. This finding is supported by the X-ray diffraction study by Mowforth et al. (1986) and Morishige et al. (1990).
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity