Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
628052
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Dermal absorption of environmental contaminants from soil and sediment: A critical review
Author(s)
Spalt, EW; Kissel, JC; Shirai, JH; Bunge, AL
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
ISSN:
1559-0631
EISSN:
1559-064X
Volume
19
Issue
2
Page Numbers
119-148
Language
English
PMID
18830234
DOI
10.1038/jes.2008.57
Web of Science Id
WOS:000262500600001
URL
http://www.nature.com/jes/journal/v19/n2/pdf/jes200857a.pdf
Exit
Abstract
Risk assessment of hazardous wastes sites may require characterization of the dermal availability of chemical contaminants in soil and/or sediment. Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidance for assessment of dermal exposures to contaminants in water and soil was finalized in 2004 as a supplement (Part E) to the Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS). The soil protocol presented in RAGS Part E is less sophisticated than the water protocol and is supported by less empirical data. Investigations of dermal absorption of soil and sediment-borne contaminants that have been conducted to date include in vitro and in vivo experiments using both human and surrogate skin. A review of that literature was conducted with attention to relevant criteria including consideration of layering effects, degree of chemical saturation of soil, appropriateness of particle size distribution employed, soil-chemical contact time, and continuity of soil-skin contact (in in vivo studies). Most studies published to date are deficient by virtue of execution or reporting on one or more of the selected criteria. In addition the lack of methodological standardization evident in the literature hinders systematic evaluation of results. Since additional experimental work is needed, general agreement on acceptable approaches would be useful. Recommendations for good practice are presented.
Keywords
chemical; exposure; flux; skin
Tags
•
Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)
Identified During External Peer Review
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity