Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6316892
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
Author(s)
Chung, CY; Wong, DS; Li, KK
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
ISSN:
1471-2415
EISSN:
14712415
Volume
15
Page Numbers
115
Language
English
PMID
26307540
DOI
10.1186/s12886-015-0104-1
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
To report a case of late closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) after vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique.
CASE PRESENTATION:
A 68-year-old lady with a stage IV FTMH underwent pars plana vitrectomy with 25 gauge plus transconjunctival system, ILM peeling and gas tamponade. The inverted ILM flap technique was adopted, except that no extra surgical manipulation was used to cover the macular hole with the ILM flap. Surgical outcome was monitored with serial optical coherence tomography (OCT). Complete closure of the FTMH with resolution of intraretinal cystic changes was confirmed on OCT at 16 months postoperatively. Visual acuity improved from a baseline level of 0.1 to 0.4.
CONCLUSION:
Idiopathic macular hole closure could be delayed to beyond 1 year following the inverted ILM flap technique, especially if the macular hole was not covered with the ILM flap. Not all macular holes that fail to close in the early postoperative period need to be re-operated and there may be no risk of further visual deterioration.
Tags
PFAS
•
Additional PFAS (formerly XAgency)
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity