Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6416337
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The safety of medicinal products--current attitudes--better or just new?
Author(s)
Fletcher, AP
Year
2001
Is Peer Reviewed?
0
Journal
Adverse drug reactions and toxicological reviews
ISSN:
0964-198X
Volume
20
Issue
4
Page Numbers
181-184
Language
English
PMID
11770169
Abstract
The mumps, measles and rubella (MMR) vaccine debate continues, cerivastatin (Baycol) is withdrawn from the market (and all other statins come under suspicion), blood and blood products containing the infective agent for hepatitis C are found defective under the Consumer Protection Act (1987) and the media stirs up alarm and despondency. In the United Kingdom (UK) the Medicines Act went on the statute book in 1968 and was fully implemented in 1972. A new era beckoned and we believed that the safety of medicinal products was assured. The Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM) and its sub-committees and the Medicines Commission would provide advice from the cutting edge of medical science, the 'Yellow Card' scheme would give warning signals of adverse reactions and drug disasters would be a thing of the past. As we all know, that was an unfulfilled dream and nothing seems to have changed.
Keywords
; Drugs; Side effects; Legislation; Government regulations; Public health; Blood; Vaccines; Pharmaceuticals; Reviews/
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity