Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6435346
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
THERMAL AND NONTHERMAL PROCESSING OF APPLE CIDER: STORAGE QUALITY UNDER EQUIVALENT PROCESS CONDITIONS
Author(s)
Azhuvalappil, Z; Fan, X; Geveke, DJ; Zhang, HQ
Year
2010
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Food Quality
ISSN:
0146-9428
EISSN:
1745-4557
Volume
33
Issue
5
Page Numbers
612-631
DOI
10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00342.x
Web of Science Id
WOS:000282690300005
Abstract
Three processing techniques: heat, pulsed electric field (PEF) and ultraviolet (UV) light were optimized to achieve a similar 6 log reduction of inoculated Escherichia coli K12 in apple cider. Microbial populations (total aerobic and yeast and mold), sensory, color and physical properties (pH and°Brix) of processed apple cider were investigated during 4-week storage at 4C. PEF and thermally processed cider maintained good microbial quality during 4 weeks of storage while UV-treated cider showed a significant (P < 0.05) growth in yeast and mold after 2 weeks of storage. As a result,°Brix value decreased significantly (P < 0.05) for UV cider after 4 weeks of storage. Apple cider pH was neither affected by any treatment nor by storage. Thermal and UV-pasteurized ciders faded significantly (P < 0.05) during storage (International Commission on Illumination L*[lightness] and b*[yellow] values increased) compared to PEF cider. Triangle sensory analysis indicated a significant difference (P < 0.05) in aroma between treatments. PEF-treated cider was preferred over thermal and UV cider by sensory panelists at the end of the storage period. The results suggested that PEF-treated apple cider had a longer shelf life than UV-treated cider and a better aroma and color than thermally processed sample. Nonthermal processes like pulsed electric field (PEF) and ultraviolet (UV) light are developed as alternative pasteurization technologies to heat for their efficacy to extend shelf life and enhance the safety of fresh juice while preserving organoleptic and nutritional qualities. For fair comparison of the effects on quality of juice, both thermal and nonthermal processes must achieve equivalent reduction in microorganism levels. In the present study, the effect of PEF, UV and thermal techniques on apple cider quality are compared at conditions optimized to achieve equivalent 6 log reductions in Escherichia coli. Our results showed that PEF extended the shelf-life of apple cider by inactivating spoilage microorganisms compared to UV processing, and better preserved the freshness (aroma and color) over traditional thermal processing. Based on these results, PEF process is the best choice among the three technologies studied.
Keywords
; Escherichia coli K12; apple cider; color; freshness; heat; juice quality; lighting; microbiological quality; nonthermal processing; nutritive value; odors; pH; pasteurization; pulsed electric fields; sensory evaluation; shelf life; spoilage; storage time; traditional technology; yeasts/
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity