Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6592389
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
A comparison of SMA (styrene maleic acid) and DIBMA (di-isobutylene maleic acid) for membrane protein purification
Author(s)
Gulamhussein, AA; Uddin, R; Tighe, BJ; Poyner, DR; Rothnie, AJ; ,
Year
2020
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Biomembranes
ISSN:
0005-2736
EISSN:
1879-2642
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Location
AMSTERDAM
Volume
1862
Issue
7
Page Numbers
183281-
Language
English
PMID
32209303
DOI
10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183281
Web of Science Id
WOS:000528196600010
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082775364&doi=10.1016%2fj.bbamem.2020.183281&partnerID=40&md5=9d8048efd4c04256809f6836b73cb409
Exit
Abstract
The use of styrene maleic acid co-polymer (SMA) for membrane protein extraction and purification has grown in recent years. SMA inserts in the membrane and assembles into small discs of bilayer encircled by polymer, termed SMA lipid particles (SMALPs). This allows purification of membrane proteins whilst maintaining their lipid bilayer environment. SMALPs offer several improvements over conventional detergent approaches, however there are limitations, most notably a sensitivity to low pH and divalent cations. Recently it was shown that the aliphatic diisobutylene-maleic acid (DIBMA) copolymer, was also able to directly solubilise membranes forming DIBMALPs (DIBMA lipid particles), and that this polymer overcame some of the limitations of SMA. In this study the ability of DIBMA to solubilise and purify functional membrane proteins has been compared to SMA. It was found that DIBMA is able to solubilise several different membrane proteins from different expression systems, however for some proteins it gives a lower yield and lower degree of purity than SMA. DIBMA extracted G protein-coupled receptors retain ligand- and G protein-binding. DIBMALPS are larger than SMALPs and display a decreased sensitivity to magnesium. However the stability of DIBMALPs appears to be lower than SMALPs. The lower purity and lower stability are likely linked to the larger size of the DIBMALP particle. However, this also offers a potentially less rigid lipid environment which may be more amenable to protein dynamics. Therefore the optimal choice of polymer will depend on which features of a protein are to be investigated.
Keywords
ABC transporter; DIBMALP; GPCR; Membrane protein; SMALP
Series
Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity