Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6597599
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Extractive Distillation with Ionic Liquids: Pilot Plant Experiments and Conceptual Process Design
Author(s)
Meindersma, GW; Quijada-Maldonado, E; Jongmans, MTG; Hernandez, JPG; Schuur, B; de Haan, AB; ,
Year
2016
Publisher
SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN
Location
BERLIN
Book Title
IONIC LIQUIDS FOR BETTER SEPARATION PROCESSES
Page Numbers
11-38
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-48520-0_2
Web of Science Id
WOS:000385215700003
Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) can replace conventional solvents in separation processes, such as extractive distillation (ED), because of their ability to selectively separate azeotropic/close boiling mixtures. Four case studies were selected: ethanol/water (1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide, [emim][N(CN) 2], and ethylene glycol, EG), 1-hexene/n-hexane (no suitable IL found), methylcyclohexane/toluene (1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetracyanoborate, [hmim][B(CN) 4], and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, NMP), and ethylbenzene/styrene (4-methyl-Nbutylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate, [4-mebupy][BF4], and sulfolane). Pilot plant experiments proved that the developed models for ED could well describe the experimental results.Conceptual processes were designed for the ED of three case studies. The ethanol/water process with [emim][N(CN) 2] reduced the energy requirements with 16 % compared to the process with EG, provided that proper heat integration is implemented. The methylcyclohexane (MCH)/toluene process with [hmim][B(CN) 4] required about 50 % less energy with heat integration than the conventional process with NMP with heat integration.The IL [4-mebupy][BF4] reduced the energy requirement most compared to the conventional distillation for the ethylbenzene/styrene process (43.2 %), which is 5 % lower than with extractive distillation with sulfolane. However, the capital expenditures were about 23 % higher than for the sulfolane process. It can be concluded from the total annual costs that all studied ED processes outperform the current distillation process to obtain high purity styrene, but that ILs do not perform better than sulfolane.The general conclusion of these four examples is that only in some special cases ILs can be more advantageously applied than conventional solvents in extractive distillation. The key performance points for ED are a high selectivity and high capacity, next to the solvent recovery and heat integration.
Editor(s)
Rodriguez, H;
ISBN
978-3-662-48518-7
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity