Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6606930
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
[Brominated flame retardants in WEEE: Examination of the bromine concentration by plastic types and device categories using X-ray fluorescence]
Author(s)
Jandric, A; Part, F; Fink, N; Huber-Humer, M; Salhofer, S; Zafiu, C
Year
2020
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Oesterreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft
ISSN:
0945-358X
EISSN:
1613-7566
Volume
72
Issue
1-2, SI
Page Numbers
68-76
Language
German
DOI
10.1007/s00506-019-00639-7
Abstract
Plastics in waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) often contain brominated flame retardants (BFRs), which can be unintentionally released and can have a negative impact on the environment and health. In addition, BFR reduce the quality of recycled materials, whereby limit values according to the RoHS Directive (1000 & x202f;ppm per BRF type) and the Ordinance on Waste Treatment Obligations (AbfBPV) (2000 & x202f;ppm total bromine content) must be monitored. For this study, 467 devices were selected from 11 different WEEE categories, from which a total of 1008 plastic samples were taken. The plastic types were identified using visual screening of the recycling code and FTIR spectroscopy. Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) was used to determine the total bromine content. In the WEEE analysed, 27 different plastic types were identified, with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) being the most common type (42%). The XRF measurements showed that bromine was detected in 33% of all samples. The average bromine content was approx. 240 & x202f;ppm. The RoHS limit value was exceeded in 18% of all samples from printer power supply units, 10% from PC housings, and 9% from flat screen monitors. Neither the RoHS nor the AbfBPV limit value was exceeded in electric toothbrushes, mobile phones (without touch screens), smartphones and various small devices. Such WEEE plastics would therefore be better suited for recycling. As XRF is a cost-effective and very fast analytical method, it could become suitable for excluding plastics with a high bromine content directly at the point of production.
Keywords
Water Resources; WEEE recycling; Plastic wastes; Brominated flame retardants; Persistent organic pollutants; Handheld X‑ray fluorescence; Touch screens
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity