Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6763534
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The use of SIBS triblock copolymers in cardiac surgery: in vitro and in vivo studies in comparison with ePTFE
Author(s)
Rezvova, MA; Ovcharenko, EA; Nikishev, PA; Kostyuk, SV; Antonova, LV; Akent'Eva, TN; Glushkova, TV; Velikanova, YG; Shishkova, DK; Krivkina, EO; Klyshnikov, KY; Kudryavtseva, YA; Barbarash, LS
Year
2019
Volume
21
Issue
4
Page Numbers
67-80
Language
Russian
DOI
10.15825/1995-1191-2019-4-67-80
Web of Science Id
RSCI:41709387
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85080147723&doi=10.15825%2f1995-1191-2019-4-67-80&partnerID=40&md5=6c4d58d9025f42cddcf3a1c3f1ec5b6e
Exit
Abstract
Prosthetics of heart valves by polymer has the potential to solve the problems of existing valve device - mechanical and biological. Aim: to investigate of styrene-isobutylene triblock copolymer (SIBS) biocompatibility synthesized by the controlled cation polymerization method in comparison with the polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) used in clinical practice. Materials and methods. SIBS-based films were prepared by casting from a polymer solution; a biocompatibility assessment in vitro was performed using cell cultures, determining cell viability, cell adhesion, and proliferation; the resistance of materials to calcification was determined by the method of calcification in vitro; an in vivo biocompatibility assessment was performed by subcutaneous implantation of the samples to rats; hemocompatibility was determined ex vivo by evaluation of the degree of hemolysis, aggregation and platelet adhesion. Results. The molecular weight of the synthesized polymer was 33,000 g/mol with a polydispersity index of 1.3. In the study of cell adhesion, there was no significant difference (p = 0.20) in the properties of the SIBS polymer (588 cells/mm2) from the properties of the culture plastics (732 cells/mm2), the cell adhesion for the ePTFE material was 212 cells/mm2. The percentage of dead cells on SIBS, ePTFE samples, respectively, was 4.40% and 4.72% (p = 0.93), for culture plastic - 1.16% (p < 0.05). The cell proliferation on the ePTFE surface (0.10%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than for SIBS and culture plastics (62.04% and 44.00%). Implantation results (60 days) showed the formation of fibrous capsules with average thicknesses: 42 μm (ePTFE), 58 μm (SIBS). The calcium content of the explanted samples was 0.39 mg/g (SIBS), 1.25 mg/g (ePTFE) and 93.79 mg/g (GA-xenopericardium) (p < 0.05). The hemolysis level of blood red blood cells after contact with SIBS was 0.35%, ePTFE 0.40%, which is below the positive control (p < 0.05). The maximum platelet aggregation by intact platelet-enriched plasma was 8.60%, which was in contact with the SIBS polymer - 18.11%, and ePTFE - 22.74%. Conclusion. The polymer SIBS when comparing the biocompatibility properties is not inferior to ePTFE and has the potential for use in the development of polymeric prosthetic heart valves new generation. © 2019 Russian Transplant Society. All rights reserved.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity