Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6833832
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Determination of linear and cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in biogas and biomethane by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Author(s)
Ghidotti, M; Torri, C; Fabbri, D
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Talanta
ISSN:
0039-9140
EISSN:
1873-3573
Volume
195
Page Numbers
258-264
Language
English
PMID
30625541
DOI
10.1016/j.talanta.2018.11.032
Web of Science Id
WOS:000456762000034
URL
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2189555031?accountid=171501
Exit
Abstract
A new method based on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was developed for the analysis of seven linear (L2 – L5) and cyclic (D3 – D5) volatile methyl siloxanes (VMS) in biogas and biomethane, directly collected into Tedlar® bags (Tedlar SPME) from anaerobic digesters and wastewater treatment plants. The method was employed to monitor VMS content in biomethane produced by biogas upgrading with a pilot-plant membrane unit and provided adequate limits of quantification (< 0.05 mg m−3) to detect trace siloxane impurities. Tedlar SPME was validated against a standard procedure based on indirect sampling of gas streams with sorbent tubes followed by solvent extraction and GC-MS. Method precision (RSD) on total and individual VMS concentrations was lower than 10%, while RSD values of the standard procedure were higher than 20%. Tedlar SPME suitably revealed high VMS levels, expressed as total volatile silicon (> 1 mgSim−3), in wastewater biogas and provided a more efficient sampling of heavier VMS in comparison to the sorbent tubes method. At low values (< 0.1 mgSim−3) typical of wood waste biogas and biomethane, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two methods. Overall, Tedlar SPME simplified the analytical procedure by reducing the procedural steps, avoiding the use of solvents and demonstrated its applicability for testing the quality of biomethane as advanced biofuel.
Keywords
Automotive fuel; Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane; Natural gas; Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane; Sewage sludge; Volatile organic compounds; article; anaerobic digesters; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; methane; silicon; siloxanes; solid phase microextraction; solvents; sorbents; wastewater; wastewater treatment
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity