Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6894418
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The Big Cleanup Gets It Wrong
Author(s)
Main, J
Year
1991
Is Peer Reviewed?
0
Journal
Fortune
ISSN:
0015-8259
EISSN:
0015-8240
Volume
123
Issue
10
Page Numbers
95
Language
English
Abstract
According to risk analysts, national resources are allocated to cleaning up relatively low-risk pollutants such as oil spills and nuclear wastes and not to low-visibility, high-risk pollutants such as radon detection and cleanup. Although the final bill for cleaning up toxic waste site may exceed $500 billion, the average cost to clean a Rn-contaminated house is $1100. Some high-risk dangers, however, require large capital investments to mitigate; global warming and the depletion of the ozone layer are examples. While environmental risks generate the most publicity, in fact, habits of personal choice kill more people. Smoking and poor diets account for 300,000 deaths annually, while global warming, O sub(3)-layer depletion, Rn contamination, water pollution, pesticide residues, hazardous waste sites, acid rain, and asbestos account for less than 35,000 deaths or cancer incidences annually, combined.
Keywords
Environment Abstracts; PATHOLOGY, HUMAN; POLLUTION CONTROL; HEALTH, ENV; ENV PROBLEMS, GENERAL; ECONOMICS, POLLUTION CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS; HEALTH SAFETY, OCCUPATIONAL; ASBESTOS; ENA 07:General
Tags
OPPT REs
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_Supplemental Search
LitSearch: Sept 2020 (Undated)
ProQuest
Legacy Uses
Health Outcomes
Exposure
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity