Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
6991205
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles on radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Suppression of steam popping and its clinical implication
Author(s)
Jeong, DY; Kang, TW; Min, JH; Song, KD; Lee, MW; Rhim, H; Lim, HK; Sinn, DH; Han, H
Year
2020
Is Peer Reviewed?
0
Journal
Korean Journal of Radiology
ISSN:
1229-6929
Volume
21
Issue
9
Page Numbers
1077-1086
Language
English
PMID
32691543
DOI
10.3348/kjr.2019.0910
Web of Science Id
WOS:000550662500006
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid®, GE Healthcare) on steam popping during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to assess whether popping affects treatment outcomes.
Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, which included 90 consecutive patients with single HCC, who received percutaneous RF ablation as the first-line treatment. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the presence or absence of the popping phenomenon, which was defined as an audible sound with a simultaneous sudden explosion within the ablation zone as detected via ultrasonography during the procedure. The factors contributing to the popping phenomenon were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Local tumor progression (LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test for performing comparisons between the two groups.
Results: The overall incidence of the popping phenomenon was 25.8% (24/93). Sonazoid® was used in 1 patient (4.2%) in the popping group (n = 24), while it was used in 15 patients (21.7%) in the non-popping group (n = 69). Multivariable analysis revealed that the use of Sonazoid® was the only significant factor for absence of the popping phenomenon (odds ratio = 0.10, p = 0.048). There were no significant differences in cumulative LTP and DFS between the two groups (p = 0.479 and p = 0.424, respectively).
Conclusion: The use of Sonazoid® has a suppressive effect on the popping phenomenon during RF ablation in patients with HCC. However, the presence of the popping phenomenon may not affect clinical outcomes.
Keywords
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Radiofrequency ablation; Contrast media; Explosions
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity