Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7002444
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
A toxicokinetic framework and analysis tool for interpreting OECD-305 dietary bioaccumulation tests
Author(s)
Gobas, FAPC; Lee, YS; Lo, JC; Parkerton, TF; Letinski, DJ
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
ISSN:
0730-7268
EISSN:
1552-8618
Volume
39
Issue
1
Page Numbers
171-188
Language
English
PMID
31546284
DOI
10.1002/etc.4599
Web of Science Id
WOS:000499547500001
Abstract
The Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development guideline 305 for bioaccumulation testing in fish includes the option to conduct a dietary test for assessing a chemical's bioaccumulation behavior. However, the one‐compartment toxicokinetic model that is used in the guidelines to analyze the results from dietary bioaccumulation tests is not consistent with the current state of the science, experimental practices, and information needs for bioaccumulation and risk assessment. The present study presents 1) a 2‐compartment toxicokinetic modeling framework for describing the bioaccumulation of neutral hydrophobic organic chemicals in fish and 2) an associated toxicokinetic analysis tool (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion [ADME] B calculator) for the analysis and interpretation of dietary bioaccumulation test data from OECD‐305 dietary tests. The model framework and ADME‐B calculator are illustrated by analysis of fish dietary bioaccumulation test data for 238 substances representing different structural classes and susceptibilities to biotransformation. The ADME of the chemicals is determined from dietary bioaccumulation tests and bioconcentration factors, biomagnification factors, and somatic and intestinal biotransformation rates. The 2‐compartment fish toxicokinetic model can account for the effect of the exposure pathway on bioaccumulation, which the one‐compartment model cannot. This insight is important for applying a weight‐of‐evidence approach to bioaccumulation assessment where information from aqueous and dietary test endpoints can be integrated to improve the evaluation of a chemical's bioaccumulation potential.
Keywords
bioaccumulation; bioconcentration; biomagnification; biotransformation; trophic magnification
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity