Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7026946
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Ventral Hernia Repair with Synthetic, Composite, and Biologic Mesh: Characteristics, Indications, and Infection Profile
Author(s)
Cevasco, M; Itani, KMF; ,
Year
2012
Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
Location
NEW ROCHELLE
Page Numbers
209-215
PMID
22913337
DOI
10.1089/sur.2012.123
Web of Science Id
WOS:000311830500005
Abstract
Background: A variety of mesh materials are available for ventral hernia repair (VHR), each with a unique set of characteristics. Surgeons are offered an ever-expanding selection of products, making a review of the available materials timely.Methods: Current surgical literature is reviewed to describe the different types of synthetic mesh, the indications for the use of each type, their relative risks of infection, and other benefits and shortcomings. We also review clinical studies demonstrating outcomes, efficacy, and use of the meshes in different surgical settings, including laparoscopic hernia repair and special situations such as infection or large abdominal wall defects.Results: Three main types of prosthetic mesh are available. Synthetic mesh, such as polypropylene (PP) or polyester, is characterized by high tensile strength and vigorous tissue ingrowth, but is unsuitable for intraabdominal placement because of its tendency to induce bowel adhesions. Composite, or barrier-coated, mesh is a dual-sided prosthetic having a synthetic parietal side to promote a strong repair and a visceral surface that repels tissue ingrowth and decreases adhesion formation. Biologic mesh is a collagen-based human, porcine, or bovine scaffold that may be implanted in the extra-or intra-peritoneal position. Biologic mesh is used frequently in the setting of infected or contaminated surgical incisions.Conclusions: Synthetic PP mesh is an appropriate, durable material for extra-peritoneal placement in uncomplicated, clean VHR. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and composite meshes are suitable for intraperitoneal placement during laparoscopic VHR. Biologic meshes may be appropriate for contaminated fields or other special situations, but there is no consensus on when or how to use them.
Conference Name
31st Annual Meeting of the Surgical-Infection-Society
Conference Location
Palm Beach, FL
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity