Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7148776
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Trapping of Dioxygen Dissolved in Water by Alkylhydroxylamines: A Comparison of Hydroquinone, Gallic Acid and Aminophenols as Organocatalysts
Author(s)
Lebeuf, R; Nardello-Rataj, V; Aubry, JM; ,
Year
2013
Publisher
SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
Location
NEW YORK
Page Numbers
933-938
DOI
10.1007/s11244-013-0057-7
Web of Science Id
WOS:000321664200010
Abstract
One of the most usual methods used to deoxygenate water and prevent the corrosion of industrial boilers is based on the reduction of dioxygen in aqueous alkaline solution with an hydroxylamine in the presence of catalytic amounts of hydroquinone (H(2)Q). In order to improve the effectiveness and the "greenness" of this process, the influence of the nature of the hydroxylamine and of the catalyst has been investigated. With H(2)Q as a catalyst, the efficiency of various hydroxylamines was found to be in the following order: methylhydroxylamine > dimethylhydroxylamine > hydroxylamine > tert-butylhydroxylamine > diethylhydroxylamine (DEHA). To replace the potentially carcinogenic hydroquinone, a natural polyphenol, i.e. gallic acid, which was previously shown to be safer and more robust that H(2)Q to trap O-2 in the presence of DEHA, was used. Methylhydroxylamine was still by far the most active partner, but DEHA was almost as efficient as the other hydroxylamines, free hydroxylamine being the least active oxygen scavenger. As only a catalytic amount of dioxygen scavenger is required in the presence of appropriate hydroxylamines, compounds having a bit more acute toxicity but higher reactivity than hydroquinone may also be alternative catalytic systems. Hence, five aminophenols, i.e. 4-aminophenol, 4-amino-2,5-dichlorophenol, 5-amino-salicylic acid, 4-N-methylaminophenol and 4-N,N-dimethylaminophenol, were also investigated. Among them, 4-N-methylaminophenol was found to be the most efficient although much slower than H(2)Q.
Conference Name
9th International Conference on Mechanisms of Catalytic Reactions (MCR)
Conference Location
St. Petersburg, RUSSIA
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity