Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
7163567 
Journal Article 
Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing 
Su, Lan; Huang, W; Xu, T; Cai, M; Xu, Lei; Vijayaraman, P; Sharma, PS; Chen, X; Zheng, R; Wu, S; , 
2020 
Yes 
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
ISSN: 1045-3873
EISSN: 1540-8167 
WILEY 
HOBOKEN 
834-842 
32009260 
WOS:000512159000001 
Background Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is emerging as a novel option for physiological ventricular pacing. The impact of current of injury (COI) at left bundle branch (LBB) has not been previously evaluated.Methods Consecutive patients with QRS duration less than 120 milliseconds referred for LBBP in whom LBB potentials were recorded were included from August 2018 to March 2019. We recorded LBB COI during LBBP and assessed its impact on the pacing parameters and complications during implantation and at short term follow-up.Results A total of 115 patients with an identifiable LBB potential at implant were included. LBB COI was confirmed in 77 (67.0%) of these patients. Three types of LBB COI were observed. LBB was captured in all patients at a pacing threshold less than 1.5 V/0.5 ms in COI(+) patients, while present in only 29 patients without an LBB COI(-) (100% vs 76.3%; P < .001). There was no significant difference between COI(+) and COI(-) patients in LBB bundle capture threshold (0.64 +/- 0.24 vs 0.74 +/- 0.26 V/0.5 ms). Selective LBBP was more common in COI(+) group than COI(-) group (54.5% vs 0%; P < .001). Pacing parameters were stable and no lead perforation or dislodgements were observed during follow-up.Conclusions LBB COI is commonly observed during LBBP in cases with an identifiable LBB potential and can be associated with a low LBB capture threshold and demonstrable selective capture of the LBB acutely and during follow-up. A COI does not preclude safe and stable LBBP pacing.