Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7172803
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Exudative AMD subtypes and eligibility for treatment with ranibizumab
Author(s)
George, S; Cooke, C; Chakravarthy, U; ,
Year
2010
Journal
Eye
ISSN:
0950-222X
EISSN:
1476-5454
Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Location
LONDON
Page Numbers
1247-1251
PMID
20019764
DOI
10.1038/eye.2009.301
Web of Science Id
WOS:000279976000019
Abstract
Purpose To ascertain the proportion of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) eligible for intravitreal treatment with monoclonal antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor, on the basis of inclusion criteria used in pivotal clinical trials.Methods We scrutinised an imaging database and extracted all fluorescein angiograms (FAs) captured between 1 January and 31 December 2001. Of the 1083 FA, we found 184 where features of AMD in one or both eyes that were observed. In 130 eyes with neovascular AMD, we measured the area of choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) and retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). If contiguous to the area of neovascularisation, any areas of blood, exudate, blocked fluorescence, fibrosis, and atrophy were also measured. Descriptive statistics on lesion location, size, and composition were generated and chi(2)-tests were used to test for associations.Results Of 130 eyes with neovascular AMD, a subfoveal CNV was present in over 75%. Overall, 24.6% were wholly or predominantly classic, and the remainder minimally classic or occult. Of this latter group, RAPs constituted nearly a third and were significantly associated with co-existent pigment epithelial detachment (PED). Using MARINA and ANCHOR study criteria, less than 50% would have been eligible for clinical trials for antiangiogenic therapy.Conclusions The majority of CNV were ineligible for treatment with antiangiogenic therapies when assessed solely on angiographic features. RAPs accounted for some one-third of lesions classified as minimally classic or occult at presentation, and the majority of these would have been ineligible for inclusion in the pivotal randomized control trials. Eye (2010) 24, 1247-1251; doi:10.1038/eye.2009.301; published online 18 December 2009
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity