Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
7194893 
Journal Article 
Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in testes with nonobstructive azoospermia 
Tsili, AC; Ntorkou, A; Goussia, A; Astrakas, L; Panopoulou, E; Sofikitis, N; Argyropoulou, MI; , 
2018 
Yes 
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ISSN: 1053-1807
EISSN: 1522-2586 
WILEY 
HOBOKEN 
1318-1325 
BackgroundPurpose/HypothesisThe development of noninvasive imaging parameters having the capacity to identify the population of men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) where a successful sperm retrieval outcome is of great clinical significance.To assess differences of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) in NOA testes with impaired spermatogenesis and the possible association with the presence of spermatozoa after testicular sperm extraction (TESE).Study TypePopulationRetrospective.Twenty NOA men (35 testes) and 21 age-matched controls (36 testes).Field Strength/SequenceAssessments1.5T, T1WI-SE T2WI-FSE FS SS-EP-DTI.The MRI data were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus. The average ADC and FA of testicular parenchyma was measured. NOA testes were classified as NOA with higher Johnsen score (JS) 8 (group 1) and JS <8 (group 2).Statistical TestsResultsParametric and nonparametric statistical tests were used to compare ADC and FA between NOA groups and normal testes (group 3) and to evaluate a possible association with the presence of spermatozoa after TESE.Differences in ADC were found between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.043) and groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.004), but not between groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.418). Higher values of FA were found both in NOA testes with JS 8 (P < 0.001) and JS <8 (P < 0.001) compared to controls. ADC (P = 0.096) and FA (P = 0.516) did not demonstrate differences in NOA testes with or without spermatozoa at TESE.Data ConclusionBoth ADC and FA are increased in NOA testes compared to a normal population. ADC was proven to be a more useful diagnostic adjunct tool in the identification of the population of NOA men with foci of advanced spermatogenesis. However, DTI parameters were not predictive of sperm retrieval after TESE. Level of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1318-1325.