Brain injury after cardiac arrest: from prognostication of comatose patients to rehabilitation

Cronberg, T; Greer, DM; Lilja, G; Moulaert, V; Swindell, P; Rossetti, AO

HERO ID

7284656

Reference Type

Journal Article

Subtype

Review

Year

2020

Language

English

PMID

32562686

HERO ID 7284656
Material Type Review
In Press No
Year 2020
Title Brain injury after cardiac arrest: from prognostication of comatose patients to rehabilitation
Authors Cronberg, T; Greer, DM; Lilja, G; Moulaert, V; Swindell, P; Rossetti, AO
Journal The Lancet Neurology
Volume 19
Issue 7
Page Numbers 611-622
Abstract More patients are surviving cardiac arrest than ever before; however, the burden now lies with estimating neurological prognoses in a large number of patients who were initially comatose, in whom the ultimate outcome is unclear. Neurologists, neurointensivists, and clinical neurophysiologists must accurately balance the concern that overly conservative prognostication could leave patients in a severely disabled state, with the possibility that inaccurately pessimistic prognostication could lead to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in patients who might otherwise have a good functional outcome. Prognostic tools have improved greatly, including electrophysiological tests, neuroimaging, and chemical biomarkers. Conclusions about the prognosis should be delayed at least 72 h after arrest to allow for the clearance of sedative drugs. Cognitive impairments, emotional problems, and fatigue are common among patients who have survived cardiac arrest, and often go unrecognised despite being related to caregiver burden and a decreased participation in society. Through simple screening, these problems can be identified, and patients can be provided with adequate information and rehabilitation.
Pmid 32562686
Wosid WOS:000545358600018
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English