Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7338925
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Studied on Distribution and Heavy Metal Pollution Index of Heavy Metals in Water from Upper Reaches of the Yellow River, China
Author(s)
Zuo Hang; Ma Xiao-ling; Chen Yi-zhen; Liu Ying
Year
2016
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Guangpuxue yu Guangpu Fenxi / Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
ISSN:
1000-0593
Volume
36
Issue
9
Page Numbers
3047-3052
DOI
10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2016)09-3047-06
Web of Science Id
WOS:000383306800057
Abstract
In order to understand the spatial distribution and evaluate the pollution degree of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in upper reaches of the Yellow River, surface water samples were collected from 12 selected sites during two field surveys in April 2014 (drought season) and October 2014 (normal season). The concentrations of heavy metals were determined using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for spatial variation and heavy metal pollution index. The average concentrations of the metals in the drought season and normal season decreased respectively in the order: Cr (18. 56 mu g . L-1)>As (2. 95 mu g . L-1)>Ni (1. 87 mu g . L-1)>Mn (1. 20 mu g . L-1)>Cu (1. 12 mu g . L-1)>Zn (0.59 mu g . L-1)> Pb (0.08 mu g . L-1)>Cd (0. 01 mu g . L-1); Mn (596. 89 mu g . L-1)>Zn (52.46 mu g . L-1)>Cu (36.27 mu g . L-1)>Ni (25. 11 mu g . L-1)>Cr (23. 19 mu g . L-1)>Pb (19. 51 mu g . L-1)>As (7. 30 mu g . L-1)>Cd (0. 37 mu g . L-1). The results were compared with national and international water quality guidelines, as well as literature values reported for the same river in flood season. To assess the composite influence of all the considered metals on the overall quality of the water, heavy metal pollution indices were calculated. The Heavy Metal Pollution Index (HPI) of the river calculated for the individual locations showed ranging from 6. 46 to 11. 95 in drought season, 4. 53 to 210. 53 in normal season, respectively. Both the distribution of metals and HPI of two seasons revealed obvious seasonal variation. The results showed that the degree of heavy metal contaminant was not very high and had seasonal variation; both the concentrations of metals and HPIs indicated the pollution level of the normal season was higher than it of the drought season. The results of this paper provided reliable experimental data and theoretical basis for the relevant departments to make further policy decision.
Keywords
Heavy metal; Distribution; Heavy metal pollution indices; The Yellow River
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity