Nutritional interventions for reducing the signs and symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage and accelerate recovery in athletes: current knowledge, practical application and future perspectives

Bongiovanni, T; Genovesi, F; Nemmer, M; Carling, C; Alberti, G; Howatson, G

HERO ID

7355580

Reference Type

Journal Article

Subtype

Review

Year

2020

Language

English

PMID

32661771

HERO ID 7355580
Material Type Review
In Press No
Year 2020
Title Nutritional interventions for reducing the signs and symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage and accelerate recovery in athletes: current knowledge, practical application and future perspectives
Authors Bongiovanni, T; Genovesi, F; Nemmer, M; Carling, C; Alberti, G; Howatson, G
Journal European Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume 120
Issue 9
Page Numbers 1965-1996
Abstract <strong>PURPOSE: </strong>This review provides an overview of the current knowledge of the nutritional strategies to treat the signs and symptoms related to EIMD. These strategies have been organized into the following sections based upon the quality and quantity of the scientific support available: (1) interventions with a good level of evidence; (2) interventions with some evidence and require more research; and (3) potential nutritional interventions with little to-no-evidence to support efficacy.<br /><br /><strong>METHOD: </strong>Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Science were used. The search terms 'EIMD' and 'exercise-induced muscle damage' were individually concatenated with 'supplementation', 'athletes', 'recovery', 'adaptation', 'nutritional strategies', hormesis'.<br /><br /><strong>RESULT: </strong>Supplementation with tart cherries, beetroot, pomegranate, creatine monohydrate and vitamin D appear to provide a prophylactic effect in reducing EIMD. β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate, and the ingestion of protein, BCAA and milk could represent promising strategies to manage EIMD. Other nutritional interventions were identified but offered limited effect in the treatment of EIMD; however, inconsistencies in the dose and frequency of interventions might account for the lack of consensus regarding their efficacy.<br /><br /><strong>CONCLUSION: </strong>There are clearly varying levels of evidence and practitioners should be mindful to refer to this evidence-base when prescribing to clients and athletes. One concern is the potential for these interventions to interfere with the exercise-recovery-adaptation continuum. Whilst there is no evidence that these interventions will blunt adaptation, it seems pragmatic to use a periodised approach to administering these strategies until data are in place to provide and evidence base on any interference effect on adaptation.
Doi 10.1007/s00421-020-04432-3
Pmid 32661771
Wosid WOS:000548189900002
Url http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00421-020-04432-3
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English