Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7419297
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Comparison of three amino acid analysis methods and their application to the amino acid impurity analysis for the development of high-purity amino acid certified reference materials
Author(s)
Kato, M; Yamazaki, T; Goto, M; Yoshioka, M; Kato, H; Takatsu, A
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
ISSN:
0949-1775
EISSN:
1432-0517
Publisher
SPRINGER
Location
NEW YORK
Volume
18
Issue
6
Page Numbers
481-489
Language
English
DOI
10.1007/s00769-013-1017-4
Web of Science Id
WOS:000327853700004
URL
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00769-013-1017-4
Exit
Abstract
The determination of amino acid (AA) impurity is important for the development of AA high-purity certified reference materials (CRMs), which play a key role in metrological traceability. We performed three analytical methods for the determination of AAs, such as postcolumn method derivatized with o-phthalaldehyde (OPA method), precolumn method derivatized with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxylsuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC method), and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry combined with ion-pairing reverse-phase chromatography (IP-RP-LCMS method), comparing their separation and sensitivity. We also applied them onto the AA impurity analysis in the candidate CRMs of l-isoleucine (Ile) and l-valine (Val), comparing their qualitative and quantitative performance. The OPA method was superior to others in separation and sensitivity, but several methods seemed to be necessary for the identification of the majority of AA impurities. In relation to the quantitative performance, the analytical results obtained by the different methods were equivalent within their expanded uncertainty for the detected AA impurities. On the other hand, the OPA method could detect the largest number of AA impurities and, consequently, obtained the largest sum of the mass fraction of AA impurities. The expanded measurement uncertainty of the OPA method was sufficiently smaller than the target standard uncertainty, 600 mg kg(-1), where the expanded uncertainty (k = 2) of the assigned value of high-purity AA CRM should be approximately < 0.002 kg kg(-1).
Keywords
Amino acids; Purity; Certified reference material; Amino acid impurity; Amino acid analysis
Tags
Other
•
Harmful Algal Blooms- Health Effects
April 2021 Literature Search
WOS
Scopus
Saxitoxins
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity