Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7424299
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The dose makes the poison
Author(s)
Chen, L; Giesy, JP; Xie, P; ,
Year
2018
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Science of the Total Environment
ISSN:
0048-9697
EISSN:
1879-1026
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Volume
621
Page Numbers
649-653
Language
English
PMID
29197283
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.218
Web of Science Id
WOS:000424196800065
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004896971733276X
Exit
Abstract
Some microcystins (MCs) might cause hepatotoxicity in animals and humans. MC-LR is also a tumor promoter and a suspect carcinogen. In 2010, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified MC-LR as a possible human carcinogen (Group 2B). Recently, an article entitled "Long-term, low-dose exposure to microcystin toxin does not increase the risk of liver tumor development or growth in mice" was published in Hepatology Research by Meaghan Labine and Gerald Y. Minuk. However, the experimental design was flawed and the conclusion is misleading. 1μg/L MC-LR in drinking water is the provisional guideline value established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for humans in 1998, based on a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0.04μg/kg body mass (BM). Assuming the mice drink 1.5mL/10g BM of water per day, the exposure dose would be 0.15μg/kg/d BM, about 270-fold less than 40μg/kg/d, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL). Thus, the dose of MC-LR was too small and "unlikely to result in liver tumor development or enhance existing tumor growth", even with a long-term (28weeks) exposure. Presumably, they didn't consider inter-species variations between mice and humans, including toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. Ranges of "low-dose" MCs for animals and humans should be defined. Also, the authors misunderstood or misrepresented several previous studies. Before drawing final conclusions on the carcinogenicity of MCs, further well-designed experiments are warranted.
Keywords
Equivalent doses; Experimental design; Inter-species variations; Low-dose; Microcystin; Tumor; Carcinogens; Design of experiments; International cooperation; Mammals; Potable water; Statistics; Toxic materials; Equivalent dose; Inter-species variations; International agency for research on cancers; Low dose; Microcystins; No observed adverse effect levels; Tolerable daily intake; World Health Organization; Tumors; drinking water; microcystin LR; carcinogen; microcystin; dose-response relationship; experimental design; health risk; interspecific variation; toxin; tumor; Article; cancer risk; carcinogenicity; chemical carcinogenesis; concentration response; human; liver cancer; long term exposure; maximum tolerated dose; no-observed-adverse-effect level; nonhuman; priority journal; species difference; toxicity testing; toxicokinetics; animal; chemically induced; dose response; liver tumor; mouse; Animalia; Mus; Animals; Carcinogens; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mice; Microcystins; No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; Species Specificity
Tags
Other
•
Harmful Algal Blooms- Health Effects
April 2021 Literature Search
PubMed
WOS
Scopus
Microcystins
Date Limited
PubMed
WOS
Not Date Limited
PubMed
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity