Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7474973
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The accuracy of a portable instrument for analysis of blood lead in children
Author(s)
Shannon, M; Rifai, N
Year
1997
Is Peer Reviewed?
0
Journal
Ambulatory Child Health
ISSN:
1355-5626
EISSN:
1467-0658
Volume
3
Issue
3
Page Numbers
249-254
Language
English
Abstract
Background. Screening of children for lead poisoning is complicated by cumbersome, labor intensive methods of blood lead analysis, most commonly atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). We investigated the accuracy of a portable, handheld anodic stripping voltammetry (HHASV) instrument for the measurement of blood lead in a cohort of both lead-poisoned and non-lead-poisoned children. Methods. Subjects consisted of a convenience sample of children ⤠7 years seen either at the lead treatment program or primary care clinic of an urban children's hospital. In all cases a venipuncture blood lead level was obtained as a routine part of the clinic visit. Blood was placed in lead-free sodium heparin tubes then split for analysis by AAS and HHASV. Additionally, the HHASV was compared with spiked blood lead samples obtained as part of the Centers for Disease Control quality assurance program. Outcome measures included between-group agreement, bivariate correlation, sensitivity at identifying children with lead poisoning (blood lead ⤠10 μg/dl) and reproducibility. Results. Two-hundred and thirty-one children participated in the study. Mean age (SD) was 2.8 ± 1.8 years. Eighty-one children (35%) had lead poisoning. Mean blood lead level was 9.7 μg/dl by AAS versus 9.0 μg/dl by HHASV (mean difference 1.01 μg/dl; 95% Cl, 0.65 to 1.38). Pearson's correlation coefficient for AAS versus HHASV was r = 0.948 (p = 0.001). Among the 81 children with lead poisoning HHASV identified 71 (sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.97, false-positive rate, 0.03). Triplicate measurement of 96 samples by HHASV produced a mean coefficient of variation of 0.11 ± 0.14. Conclusions. These data identify a novel method of lead analysis which is both portable and accurate. Implications for practice. This instrument offers the potential for office-based measurement of blood for practice lead in children.
Keywords
Lead poisoning; Screening; heparin; lead; anodic stripping potentiometry; article; atomic absorption spectrometry; autoanalysis; blood analysis; child; comparative study; controlled study; correlation function; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic approach route; health center; human; intermethod comparison; lead blood level; lead poisoning; major clinical study; medical instrumentation; methodology; outcomes research; pediatric hospital; primary medical care; priority journal; quality control; reproducibility; screening test; statistical analysis; urban area; vein puncture; venous blood
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity