Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7643451
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Precision agriculture and sustainability
Author(s)
Bongiovanni, R; Lowenberg-Deboer, J
Year
2004
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Precision Agriculture
ISSN:
1385-2256
EISSN:
1573-1618
Volume
5
Issue
4
Page Numbers
359-387
Language
English
DOI
10.1023/B:PRAG.0000040806.39604.aa
Web of Science Id
BCI:BCI200500049913
URL
http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:PRAG.0000040806.39604.aa
Exit
Abstract
Precision Agriculture (PA) can help in managing crop production inputs in an environmentally friendly way. By using site-specific knowledge, PA can target rates of fertilizer, seed and chemicals for soil and other conditions. PA substitutes information and knowledge for physical inputs. A literature review indicates PA can contribute in many ways to long-term sustainability of production agriculture, confirming the intuitive idea that PA should reduce environmental loading by applying fertilizers and pesticides only where they are needed, and when they are needed. Precision agriculture benefits to the environment come from more targeted use of inputs that reduce losses from excess applications and from reduction of losses due to nutrient imbalances, weed escapes, insect damage, etc. Other benefits include a reduction in pesticide resistance development. One limitation of the papers reviewed is that only a few actually measured directly environmental indices, such as leaching with the use of soil sensors. Most of them estimated indirectly the environmental benefits by measuring the reduced chemical loading. Results from an on-farm trial in Argentina provide an example of how site-specific information and variable rate application could be used in maintaining profitability while reducing N applications. Results of the sensitivity analysis show that PA is a modestly more profitable alternative than whole field management, for a wide range of restrictions on N application levels. These restrictions might be government regulations or the landowner's understanding of environmental stewardship. In the example, variable rate of N maintains farm profitability even when nitrogen is restricted to less than half of the recommended uniform rate.
Tags
•
Third Biofuels Report to Congress
Included in External Review Draft
Chapter 12: Terrestrial Ecosystem Health and Biodiversity
Included in Final Report
Chapter 12: Terrestrial Ecosystem Health and Biodiversity
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity