Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
7666317 
Journal Article 
r-strategist versus K-strategist for the application in bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils 
Brzeszcz, J; Steliga, T; Kapusta, P; Turkiewicz, A; Kaszycki, P; , 
2016 
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
ISSN: 0964-8305
EISSN: 1879-0208 
ELSEVIER SCI LTD 
OXFORD 
106 
41-52 
English 
A laboratory study was undertaken to determine the degradative potentials of the pure bacterial strains Mycobacterium frederiksbergense IN53 (Actinobacteria, a K-strategist) and Acinetobacter sp. IN47 (Gammaproteobacteria, an r-strategist) as well as a combination of these strains under harsh environmental conditions (high hydrocarbon load: 50,883 and 46,682 mg kg(-1) dry weight of soil for non-sterile and sterile soil samples, respectively; moisture content lower than 20%). A decrease in total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and the activity of soil enzymes (dehydrogenase and lipase) indicated that the effects of M. frederiksbergense IN53 and the consortium were equivalent. However, these two microbial treatments showed significantly better degradative actions than Acinetobacter sp. IN47. Similar biodegradation yields were observed in sterile and non-sterile soil samples. These results suggest that bioaugmentation with M. frederiksbergense IN53 (K-strategist) provides a better approach for the treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated sites in which the optimum remediation bioprocess conditions are difficult to maintain. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
Acinetobacter; Bioremediation; Consortium; Contamination; Mycobacterium; Petroleum hydrocarbons