Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7666425
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Removal of oxyfluorfen from spiked soils using electrokinetic fences
Author(s)
Risco, C; Rubi-Juarez, H; Rodrigo, S; Lopez Vizcaino, R; Saez, C; Canizares, P; Barrera-Diaz, C; Navarro, V; Rodrigo, MA; ,
Year
2016
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Separation and Purification Technology
ISSN:
1383-5866
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Location
AMSTERDAM
Page Numbers
55-62
DOI
10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.050
Web of Science Id
WOS:000377738800008
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1383586616302416
Exit
Abstract
In this work, an accidental spill of Fluoxyl (commercial herbicide containing oxyfluorfen) is simulated in a pilot plant with a soil volume of 70 x 50 x 50 cm(3). The transport of Fluoxyl obtained by the free diffusion. of pollution and under the application of the electrokinetic fences (EKF) technology are compared in a 34 day treatment. In addition, the temperature, conductivity, and pH are monitored daily. At the end of the experiment, a post-mortem analysis is carried out in order to obtain a 3-D distribution map of the pollutant. The results show that EKF is a good technology to remove oxyfluorfen from the soil without excavation because it is able to attain a fast transfer of oxyfluorfen to the flushing fluid used. After 34 days, the decrease in the concentration of oxyfluofen in the simulated case without any treatment is only 5.5%, whereas when EKF is applied, the removal yield is approximately 63% (60.7% of improvement vs. natural volatilization). Detailed analyses of the experimental data, the 3-D map, and recent literature suggest that the main mechanism involved for the removal is the rapid transfer of oxyfluorfen to the flushing fluid used. The results are also discussed in the context of a previous work in which the same technology has been applied for the removal of the ionic herbicide 2,4-D. A comparison allows sound conclusions to be made for future scale-up studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity