Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7685437
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Wheelchair configuration and postural alignment in persons with spinal cord injury
Author(s)
Hastings, JD; Fanucchi, ER; Burns, SP; ,
Year
2003
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN:
0003-9993
EISSN:
1532-821X
Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO
Location
PHILADELPHIA
Volume
84
Issue
4
Page Numbers
528-534
Language
English
PMID
12690591
DOI
10.1053/apmr.2003.50036
Web of Science Id
WOS:000182071700010
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003999302048542
Exit
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether postural alignment and shoulder flexion range differ for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) seated in wheelchairs with standard configurations versus wheelchairs with posterior seat inclination and a low backrest set perpendicular to the floor.Design: Prospective repeated-measures study.Setting: Outpatient SCI clinic.Participants: Fourteen subjects with C6-T10 motor-complete SCI.Interventions: Subjects sat in 3 manual wheelchairs: standard setup E&J Premier (S1), standard setup Quickie Breezy (S2), and test configuration Quickie TNT (T) with posterior seat inclination and a low backrest set perpendicular to the floor.Main Outcome Measures: Shoulder and neck alignment and pelvic tilt were determined from sagittal plane digital photographs at rest and with maximal vertical reach.Results: At rest, T produced less shoulder protraction than either standard configuration (difference between the mean values, S1: 1.6cm, P=.048; S2: 1.2cm, P=.013). SI and S2 showed a greater head-forward position than T (differences between the mean values, S1: 6.5degrees, P=.008; S2: 6.3degrees, P=.013). T allowed greater humeral flexion than S2 (difference between the mean values: 3.7degrees, P=.036) and greater vertical reach above the seat plane than either conventional configuration (differences between the mean values, S1: 4.7cm, P=.005; S2: 4.1cm, P=.002). The indirect pelvic tilt measurement showed a trend (P=.06) toward greater posterior pelvic tilt with S1 and S2.Conclusion: The alternate configuration produces more vertical postural alignment and greater reach ability versus the standard factory setup wheelchairs.
Keywords
Rehabilitation; Shoulder; Spinal cord injuries; Wheelchairs
Conference Name
Annual Meeting of the American-Spinal-Injury-Association
Conference Location
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity