Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7685751
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
THE TROUBLE WITH TNT EQUIVALENCE
Author(s)
Locking, PM; ,
Year
2011
Publisher
DESTECH PUBLICATIONS, INC
Location
LANCASTER
Page Numbers
143-154
Language
English
Web of Science Id
WOS:000297632200016
Abstract
When assessing a high explosive, most blast calculations require the mass as an equivalent charge of TNT, since TNT is used by many algorithms as the baseline. This equivalency is expected to give the same performance as the charge in question. Accurate equivalences are therefore key in determining performance. Unfortunately, there are no definitive methods or documents. Variability is found to be so significant that errors can be up to 50%, with 20% to 30% being typical. Three standard explosives (RDX, HMX and Comp B) were assessed in detail and their TNT equivalence calculated. Standard scaling theory indicates that TNT equivalence should be constant, this is shown as incorrect. UFC manuals recommend only the use of Heats of Detonation for equivalence, this and other functions such as Power Index and Hydrodynamic Work are assessed. This paper looks at the issues and recommends that Power Index is used to calculate the TNT equivalence for blast.
Editor(s)
Baker, E; Templeton, D;
Conference Name
26th International Symposium on Ballistics
Conference Location
Miami, FL
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity