Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7693921
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Indoor Household Particulate Matter Measurements Using a Network of Low-cost Sensors
Author(s)
Hegde, S; Min, KT; Moore, J; Lundrigan, P; Patwari, N; Collingwood, S; Balch, A; Kelly, KE; ,
Year
2020
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
ISSN:
1680-8584
EISSN:
2071-1409
Publisher
TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
Location
TAICHUNG COUNTY
Page Numbers
381-394
DOI
10.4209/aaqr.2019.01.0046
Web of Science Id
WOS:000518390700014
URL
https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-19-01-lcs-0046
Exit
Abstract
The World Health Organization estimates that 4.3 million deaths globally in 2012 were attributable to household air pollution, of which particulate matter (PM) with a diameter of 2.5 mu m or less (PM2.5) is a significant contributor. When integrated with a wireless network, low-cost PM measurements potentially provide personalized information on indoor concentrations in real time so that individuals can take action. The objectives of this study were to (1) deploy a network of research-grade instruments and low-cost sensors in a home environment and evaluate the performance, (2) characterize activities and conditions that increase PM concentrations, and (3) identify how these activities affect the PM levels in different rooms of a home. The wireless sensor network included low-cost PM sensors, a gateway, and a database for storing data. Based on the commercially available Dylos DC1100 Pro (Utah Modified Dylos Sensor) and Plantower PMS sensor (AirU), the low-cost sensors were compared to three research-grade instruments-the GRIMM, DustTrak, and MiniVol-in two households in Salt Lake City during summer and winter, with the results suggesting that the low-cost sensors agreed well with the DustTrak. Of the activities, frying food and spraying aerosol products generated the largest increase in PM, both in the room of the activity (the kitchen and bedroom, respectively) and the adjacent rooms. High outdoor PM concentrations during a cold air pool episode also caused indoor levels to rise. In addition, different PM sources triggered different sensor responses. Consequently, obtaining accurate estimates of the mass concentration in an indoor environment, with its wide variety of PM sources, is challenging. However, low-cost PM sensors can be incorporated into an indoor air-quality measurement network to help individuals manage their personal exposure.
Tags
•
LitSearch-NOx (2024)
Forward Citation Search
Exposure
Results
Indoor
WoS
Activity Levels
WoS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity