Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
769845
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Screen-aided CO2 control (SACC): a middle ground between FACE and open-top chambers
Author(s)
Leadley, P; Niklaus, P; Stocker, R; Korner, C
Year
1997
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Acta Oecologica
ISSN:
1146-609X
EISSN:
1873-6238
Volume
18
Issue
3
Page Numbers
207-219
DOI
10.1016/S1146-609X(97)80007-0
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1997YA14300007
URL
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1146609X97800070
Exit
Abstract
We have developed a novel CO2 exposure system for natural
vegetation that is a middle ground between Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) and traditional open-
top chambers (OTC). Screen-Aided CO2 Control (SACC) technology uses much less CO2 per experiment
and per replicate than FACE and is superior to OTCs in terms of its effects on microclimate. A
SACC unit consists of a thin metal frame, a clear plastic ''screen'', and a pipe at the base
of the screen through which CO2 enriched jets of air are directed into the unit. There is a gap
between the ground and the bottom of the pipe and the screen is relatively short in comparison to
the maximum height of the vegetation. Our SACC units are hexagonal and enclose a ground area of
1.27 m(2). SACC works in the following way: 1) the screen breaks the wind and creates turbulent
mixing within the unit, 2) the mixing of the outside air with the CO2 enriched jets of
air,generates relatively uniform CO2 concentrations within the screened-in vegetation, and 3) a
fully automated system monitors CO2 concentrations and adjusts CO2 injection rates for each unit
every ca. IO minutes to maintain preset CO2 concentrations. Twenty-four hour means of CO2
concentrations in the middle of a unit are typically maintained within 1 mu l l(-1) of their set
points. Spatial variation and short-term fluctuations in CO2 concentration are similar to those
in OTCs and FACE. CO2 consumption at our site is 5 kg CO2 day(-1) replicate(-1) for a total of
ca. 30 tons per year for 20 elevated CO2 SACC units. Compared to OTCs, SACC units have reduced
temperature peaks at full sunlight, minimal effects on solar radiation, reduced rainfall
interception by chamber walls, and freer access of small animals to experimental plots. We
believe that SACC is the best method for exposing short stature vegetation to elevated CO2 when
financial constraints do not allow for a properly replicated FACE experiment.
Keywords
elevated CO2; open-top chambers; free-air CO2 enrichment; microclimate
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity