Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7900257
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland
Author(s)
Reside, AE; Beher, J; Cosgrove, AJ; Evans, MC; Seabrook, L; Silcock, JL; Wenger, AS; Maron, M
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Pacific Conservation Biology
ISSN:
1038-2097
Publisher
Surrey Beatty and Sons Pty Ltd
Volume
23
Issue
3
Page Numbers
219-230
Language
English
DOI
10.1071/PC17001
Abstract
Land clearing threatens biodiversity, impairs the functioning of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, and is a key contributor to human-induced climate change. The rates of land clearing in the State of Queensland, Australia, are at globally significant levels, and have been the subject of intense and polarised political debate. In 2016, a legislative bill that aimed to restore stronger controls over land clearing failed to pass in the Queensland Parliament, despite the clear scientific basis for policy reform. Here, we provide a short history of the recent policy debate over land clearing in Queensland, in the context of its global and national ecological significance. Land clearing affects regional climates, leading to hotter, drier climates that will impact on the Queensland economy and local communities. Loss of habitat from land clearing is a key threatening process for many endangered animals and plants. Runoff from land clearing results in sediment and nutrient enrichment, which threatens the health of the Great Barrier Reef. Australia has made national and international commitments to conserve biodiversity and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, but current land clearing policies are not consistent with these commitments. Stronger regulation is needed to reduce vegetation loss, such as target-based regulation, which sets a cap on land clearing and could effectively halt vegetation loss over the long term. Lasting policy reform is required, and we recommend an effective policy mix that restricts clearing, provides economic opportunities for vegetation retention, and informs the Australian community about the value of native vegetation. © 2017 CSIRO.
Keywords
agriculture; Australia; Brigalow Belt; Cape York Peninsula; deforestation; Great Barrier Reef; habitat loss; land use change; threatened species; woodlands; animal; anthropogenic effect; biodiversity; climate change; deforestation; endangered species; freshwater environment; greenhouse gas; habitat loss; land use change; marine environment; nutrient enrichment; plant; policy reform; regional climate; runoff; terrestrial environment; woodland; Australia; Australia; Brigalow Belt; Cape York Peninsula; Coral Sea; Great Barrier Reef; Queensland; Queensland; Animalia
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity