Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7908056
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Electrochemical quantification of 2,6-diisopropylphenol (propofol)
Author(s)
Langmaier, Jan; Garay, F; Kivlehan, F; Chaum, E; Lindner, E
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Analytica Chimica Acta
ISSN:
0003-2670
EISSN:
1873-4324
Volume
704
Issue
1-2
Page Numbers
63-67
Language
English
PMID
21907022
DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2011.08.003
Web of Science Id
WOS:000296824600006
Abstract
2,6-Diisopropylphenol (propofol) is a potent anesthetic drug with fast onset of the anesthetic effect and short recovery time for the patients. Outside of the United States, propofol is widely used in performing target controlled infusion anesthesia. With the long term vision of an electrochemical sensor for in vivo monitoring and feedback controlled dosing of propofol in blood, different alternatives for the electrochemical quantification of propofol using diverse working electrodes and experimental conditions are presented in this contribution. When the electrochemical oxidation of propofol takes place on a glassy carbon working electrode, an electrochemically active film grows on the electrode surface. The reduction current of the film is proportional to the propofol concentration and the accumulation time. Based on these findings a stripping analytical method was developed for the detection of propofol in acidic solutions between 0 and 30 μM, with a detection limit of 5.5±0.4 μM. By restricting the scanned potential window between 0.5 V and 1.0 V in cyclic voltammetric experiments, the formation of the electrochemically active polymer can be prevented. This allowed the development of a direct voltammetric method for assessing propofol in acidic solutions between 0 and 30 μM, with a 3.2±0.1 μM (n=3) detection limit. The stripping method has a better sensitivity but somewhat worse reproducibility because the electrode surface has to be renewed between each experiment. The direct method does not require the renewal of the electrode surface between measurements but has no adequate selectivity towards the common interfering compounds.
Keywords
2,6-Diisopropylphenol; Propofol; Anesthesia; Target-controlled infusion anesthesia; Electrochemistry; Cyclic voltammetty
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity