Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
7950798
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Spastic diplegia and other motor disturbances in infants receiving interferon-alpha
Author(s)
Michaud, AP; Bauman, NM; Burke, DK; Manaligod, JM; Smith, RJ
Year
2004
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Laryngoscope
ISSN:
0023-852X
EISSN:
1531-4995
Volume
114
Issue
7
Page Numbers
1231-1236
Language
English
PMID
15235352
DOI
10.1097/00005537-200407000-00017
Web of Science Id
WOS:000222651100017
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To determine how frequently the use of -interferon (-IFN) is associated with the development of spastic diplegia.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:
Meta-analysis of 600 English manuscripts published January 1991 to June 2002 reporting -IFN use in infants/children. We identified 3,113 children 18 years of age or younger and an estimated 3,055 children 12 years of age or younger who received -IFN therapy. Sixty-nine percent were treated for chronic hepatitis and 14% for vascular neoplasms.
OUTCOME MEASURE:
Neurologic examination to confirm spastic diplegia or a motor developmental disturbance other than spastic diplegia such as hyperactive deep tendon reflexes, gait disturbances, or impaired fine motor control.
RESULTS:
Including our index case, 11 of 441 children with vascular lesions developed spastic diplegia and an additional 16 of 441 developed a motor developmental disturbance. All of these children were less than 1 year of age at initiation of therapy. Mean age of initiation and duration of -IFN therapy were not significantly different between groups (P >.05); however, motor developmental disturbances improved with cessation of therapy, whereas spastic diplegia did not. No child receiving treatment for chronic hepatitis developed neurologic complications; however, only 49 children were less than 1 year of age at initiation of therapy.
CONCLUSION:
-IFN should not be used in infants under 1 year of age unless life-threatening conditions do not respond to any other form of treatment. If -IFN must be used, children should have monthly neurologic examinations. If a motor developmental disturbance is detected and -IFN therapy can be discontinued, it should be.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity