Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8040402
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Predator transitions in stream communities: a model and evidence from field studies
Author(s)
Creed, RP
Year
2006
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
ISSN:
0887-3593
EISSN:
1937-237X
Volume
25
Issue
3
Page Numbers
533-544
DOI
10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[533:PTISCA]2.0.CO;2
Web of Science Id
WOS:000239769000001
Abstract
The role of predators (particularly top predators such as fish) in structuring stream communities has been debated for 2 decades. Much of the debate may have been caused by the lack of a conceptual framework for evaluating predator effects in stream communities. First, I propose a general conceptual model of the factors (abiotic, such as stream permanence and disturbance regime; biotic, such as predation) that can influence community structure, and the conditions in which these various factors would be expected to be important. Hydrologic permanence and disturbance transitions separate streams where abiotic factors are most important in determining community structure from streams with relatively benign disturbance regimes where predation may be more important. Second, I focus on the potential effect of predators in perennial streams with relatively benign disturbance regimes. Such streams are divided longitudinally into sections where different types of predators might be important in determining community structure. Large invertebrates (stoneflies, dragonflies, shrimp, and crayfish) and salamanders may be the dominant benthic predators affecting species composition in small perennial fishless streams. A transition from invertebrate- and amphibian-dominated to fish-dominated systems may occur in larger, downstream sections (predator transition 1). In addition, longitudinal transitions in fish-assemblage structure from upstream tributaries to downstream main-channel fish assemblages (predator transition 2) may affect community structure. I present evidence supporting the above model and suggest experimental approaches to test the model. This conceptual framework may help in understanding the role of specific predators in determining prey distributions in many stream communities.
Keywords
predation; fish; macroinvertebrates; environmental gradients; species composition; community structure; cold-water fish; warm-water fish; trout; sunfish
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity