Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8222779
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
HMX对åºä½æ¨è¿åå¨å¼ºçå²å»æ¡ä»¶ä¸ååºç¹æ§çå½±å
Author(s)
Li, W; Zhang, J; Xu, S; Liu, D; Li, M; Li, H; Tian, Y
Year
2019
Publisher
Journal of Solid Rocket Technology
Volume
42
Issue
5
Page Numbers
591-596
Language
Chinese
DOI
10.7673/j.issn.1006-2793.2019.05.008
Abstract
To investigate the effect of HMX on the low vulnerability characteristic of solid propellant, including responses upon projectile impact, fragment impact, and jet impact, these experiments have been conducted on two kinds of typical solid propellants. The difference between these two propellants is one contains 20 % of HMX(Sample A), and the other one is blank(Sample B). The results showed that the response type of A and B are burning in projectile impact tests and fragments impact tests. In contrast with projectile impact tests, the combustion rates in fragments impact tests were increased faster. When there is a small amount of HMX in formula, the burning rates in axial and radial tests were increased by 4.44 and 1.14 times, respectively. The impact responsive degree of propellant in axial tests is 1.61 times higher than that in radial tests. In jet impact tests, A detonated while B burned rapidly, which means HMX has obvious effect on the responsive characteristic of composite solid propellant in jet impact tests. © 2019, Editorial Dept. of JSRT. All right reserved.
Keywords
Fragment impact; Jet impact; Low vulnerability; Projectile impact; Solid propellant
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity