Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8224753
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
HPTLC method for the determination of lupeol from Calotropis Procera root bark and Nyctanthes arbortristis leaves
Author(s)
Rupal, C; Vadalia, KR; Gokani, RG; Chavda, KV
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
ISSN:
2656-0097
EISSN:
0975-1491
Volume
5
Issue
2
Page Numbers
547-550
Language
English
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84876014921&partnerID=40&md5=0de30c30696b43fd711c91eeeb1821e5
Exit
Abstract
Objective: Development of a simple, rapid, selective and quantitative HPTLC method for determination of lupeol from root bark of Calotropis procera R. Br. and leaf of Nyctanthes arbortristis Linn. Methods: Standard curve for lupeol was obtained by applying different concentration of standard lupeol solution. Different concentration of standard lupeol along with the hexane extracts of Calotropis procera root bark and Nyctanthes arbortristis. Linn. leaf were applied on TLC aluminium plate precoated with Silica gel60 GF254 and developed using benzene: chloroform (1:1) v/v as a mobile phase. The plate was sprayed (derivatized) with 5% v/v aqueous sulphuric acid reagent followed by heating for 10 min. Detection and quantification were carried out by densitometry at wavelength of 366 nm. Percentage of lupeol in both samples was calculated using standard curve. The developed method was validated in terms of linearity, precision, repeatability and accuracy. Results: Percentage of lupeol found in the root bark of C. procera and leaf of N. arbortristis was 0.165% w/w and 0.503% w/w respectively. A good linearity was obtained for lupeol in the range of 0.1-0.6 μg/spot. The mean recovery was close to 100%, which indicates the accuracy of the method proposed. The method was also found specific and reproducible. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were found to be 12.4 ng/spot and 37.57 ng/spot respectively. Conclusion: The method was found to be simple, precise, accurate, specific, reproducible and can be used for routine quality control of C. procera root bark and N. arbortristis Linn. leaf powder, also for the quantification of lupeol in plant materials.
Keywords
Calotropis procera; HPTLC; Lupeol; Nyctanthes arbortristis
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity