Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8381789
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (100/25; 200/25 μg) improves lung function in COPD: A randomised trial
Author(s)
Martinez, FJ; Boscia, J; Feldman, G; Scott-Wilson, C; Kilbride, S; Fabbri, L; Crim, C; Calverley, PMA
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Respiratory Medicine
ISSN:
0954-6111
EISSN:
1532-3064
Volume
107
Issue
4
Page Numbers
550-559
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/j.rmed.2012.12.016
Abstract
Background: Once-daily combination treatment is an attractive maintenance therapy for COPD. However, the dose of inhaled corticosteroid to use in a once-daily combination is unknown. We compared two strengths of fluticasone furoate (FF) plus vilanterol (VI), the same strengths of the individual components, and placebo. Methods: Multicentre, randomised, 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in stable, moderate-to-severe COPD subjects (N = 1224). Subjects were randomised to FF/VI (200/25 μg; 100/25 μg), FF (200 μg; 100 μg), VI 25 μg, or placebo, once daily in the morning. Co-primary efficacy endpoints; 0-4 h weighted mean (wm) FEV1 on day 168, and change from baseline in trough (23-24 h post-dose) FEV1 on day 169. The primary safety objective was adverse events (AEs). Results: There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in wm FEV1 (209 ml) and trough FEV1 (131 ml) for FF/VI 200/25 μg vs. placebo; similar changes were seen for FF/VI 100/25 μg vs. placebo. Whereas the difference between FF/VI 200/25 μg and VI 25 μg in change from baseline trough FEV 1 (32 ml) was not statistically significant (p = 0.224), the difference between FF/VI 200/25 μg and FF 200 μg for wm FEV1 (168 ml) was significantly different (p < 0.001). VI 25 μg significantly improved wm and trough FEV1 vs. placebo (209 ml and 131 ml, respectively). No increase was seen in on-treatment AEs or serious AEs (SAEs), with active therapy vs. placebo. Conclusions: FF/VI provides rapid and significant sustained improvement in FEV1 in subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD, which was not influenced by the dose of FF. These data suggest that FF/VI may offer clinical efficacy in COPD and warrants additional study. GSK study number: HZC112207. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01054885.© 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
COPD; Dose-range; ICS; LABA; Lung function; Once-daily
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity