Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8446807
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Model solvent systems for QSAR. Part 2. Fragment values (âf-valuesâ) for the âcritical quartetâ
Author(s)
Leahy, DE; Morris, JJ; Taylor, PJ; Wait, AR
Year
1992
Issue
4
Page Numbers
723-731
Language
English
DOI
10.1039/P29920000723
Abstract
A data matrix has been prepared of log P values for 103 compounds distributed across four highly contrasted solvent-water partitioning systems: the âcritical quartetâ of octanol (amphiprotic), alkane (inert), chloroform (proton donor) and propylene glycol dipelargonate (PGDP; proton acceptor). Here âalkaneâ is defined as the straight-chain sequence from hexane to octane and (possibly) higher; it is shown that cyclohexane is out of line. In principle, these log P values can now be used to construct a comparative table of fragment values (f-values) for all four systems. In practice, those for non-polar substituents must first be established. Here the key quantity is f(CH2). This has been re-determined, and in the process its variability rationalised, for 24 water-saturated solvent systems; here the key factors (dry solvents are different) turn out to be the molarity, in the organic phase, of water and the solventâs own functional group. There results an almost complete data matrix of 82 f-values for all four solvents, about 25% of which are derived from the linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) equations of Part 3.7 It is shown that these four sets are very distinct, a fact that misleading statistical treatments can easily disguise. How the medicinal chemist might use these contrasting data sets is critically discussed, with particular reference to the rationalisation of biological selectivity. © The Royal Society of Chemistry, 1992. All rights reserved.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity